March Madness is Always Rough on Favorites and this Year, Not the Exception


March Madness is designed to give the favorites the best chance of winning the tournament, but even then, the favorites only have a 20 to 25 percent chance of winning the championship. Even though the favorites are three to four times more likely to lose early in the tournament than to win it all, there are usually one or two favorites in the Final Four. This year, the best teams in college basketball aren’t very dominant, which means a lot of March Madness predictions are going to bewrong.

Since the best teams in college basketball this season aren’t as good as the top teams from previous seasons, this year’s March Madness has the potential to be the most upset-filled tournament, which is a good thing for fans that enjoy seeing underdogswin.

According to a variety of metrics used to predict a team’s success in the NCAA tournament, Michigan State is considered to be the best team in the country. Although there are other indicators pointing to North Carolina, Villanova, and Kansas as the bestteams.

Assuming Michigan State is the best team, they are the weakest top-ranked team in recent tournament history. According to statistics, the 2005-2006 Duke Blue Devils are the only team with a lower power rating going into the tournament in the past 10years.

Using Ken Pomeroy’s college basketball ratings, Virginia has the best chance of winning the tournament at 12 percent. The 12 percent probability of Virginia winning the tournament is lower than the 20-25 percent top seeds usually have of winning thetournament.

Villanova comes in with the second-best chance of winning the tournament at 11.7 percent, and Michigan State is third in Pomeroy’s ratings with a 10.4 percent chance of winning thetournament.

If Pomeroy’s rating is used to determine the top seeds in the tournament, Michigan State might not earn a #1 seed in thetournament.

The March Madness seeding bracket was re-simulated after the top teams were assigned the typical strength suggested by the Pomeroy rankings to determine how much better the teams would be if they were as strong as they would be in an ordinaryseason.

The new reconfiguration showed that if Michigan State were as strong as the average top seed, the team would win this year’s tournament a little less than 17 percent of the time, which is significantly better than the 10 percent chance that they currentlyhave.

If Villanova were as strong as the average top seed, the team would win this year’s tournament 18 percent of the time, which is also better than the 11.7 percent chance the team currentlyhas.

The total win probability of the top three teams in Pomeroy’s ratings is 14 percentage points lower than it would be in most seasons. The reason for the drop in win probability is because there was so much parity in college basketball this year because the top teams aren’t as good as they usuallyare.

Thanks to the parity displayed this year, the rest of the field has a better win probability than they usually do, which means there will be a lot of upsets to look forward to thisyear.

All opinions expressed on USDR are those of the author and not necessarily those of US Daily Review.
Show Buttons
Share On Facebook
Share On Twitter
Share On Google Plus
Share On Linkdin
Share On Pinterest
Share On Reddit
Share On Stumbleupon
Contact us
Hide Buttons
Rimons twitter widget by Rimon Habib