Reading Time: 2 minutes
By MRCTV.org, Special for USDR
“President Obama’s call for a $95 billion energy tax hike would thwart the very goals expressed in his State of the Union address,” said American Petroleum Institute (API) Pres. Jack Gerard said today. “America’s oil and natural gas renaissance has done everything on the president’s State of the Union wish list for the middle class,” Gerard said, responding to Obama’s proposed budget.
“Opposition to President Obama’s proposals is strong and bipartisan. The president’s annual call to raise taxes on U.S. oil and natural gas development would hurt job creation, infrastructure investment, the federal deficit, seniors on fixed incomes and domestic manufacturing.” “Tax increases would jeopardize America’s competitiveness as it would discourage future investment” and lead to higher prices at the pump, he warns.
Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), chair of the Senate’s Environment and Public Works (EPW) committee, agrees – adding that Obama’s taxes would not only increase consumer costs, but would also cost jobs: “Of the $2.1 trillion in new taxes proposed by the president, $95 billion is targeted at Oklahoma’s oil and gas industry.
“The proposed budget would repeal the expensing of intangible drilling costs, percentage depletion, and the Section 199 manufacturers deduction. Each of these provisions lowers the cost of drilling and enables companies to continue growing their businesses. Further, the president proposes repealing the Master Limited Partnership organizational structure, which would dramatically increase the cost of raising capital for Oklahoma’s energy industry and, in turn, would stifle job creation. Between the president’s unwillingness to complete the Keystone pipeline, the federal land grab in Alaska, and now his targeting of these provisions, it is clear the president does not support energy independence as an affordable, near-term goal.”
The oil and natural gas industry supports 9.8 million U.S. jobs and 8 percent of the U.S. economy.
All opinions expressed on USDR are those of the author and not necessarily those of US Daily Review.