Big ticket transformative deals surge in 2013 driving global technology M&A value to a post-dotcom-bubble record


Opportunity and disruption combined in 2013 to drive global technology M&A aggregate value up 65% to a post-dotcom-bubble record of US$188.2b, according to EY’s Global technology M&A update: October–December 2013 and year in review report.

Companies pursuing strategic growth opportunities related to the five transformative megatrends, which include mobile, social, cloud, big data analytics and accelerated technology adaptation, drove big ticket transformative deals in 2013, as many established companies found themselves at a crossroads by the disruptive power of these same megatrends.

Big-ticket deals (of US$1b or more) increased in number to 36 in 2013, up from 28 in the prior year, and more than doubled in value, to US$122.6b in 2013 compared with US$51.8b in 2012. Full-year average value was US$283m, up 51% from US$188min 2012.

Joe Steger, EY’s Global Technology Industry Transaction Advisory Services Leader, says:

“Big, transformative deals returned in 2013, whether driven by the strategic growth opportunities emerging from customer demand related to the five transformative technology megatrends of mobile, social, cloud, big data analytics and accelerated technology adaptation, or the opportunity to re-invigorate companies disrupted by those megatrends. A surge in confidence in the global economy by technology executives and the disruption being caused by the megatrends, despite recent stock market volatility, continued political instability and lingering valuation gaps, indicate 2014 will be a strong year for technology M&A.”

The report identifies the following key trends and deal drivers:

  • Security, financial services and ecosystem-building drove deals. 2013 saw a spike in deals targeting financial services technology such as mobile payments, as well as deals for application programming interfaces (APIs), mobile back-end-as-a service (MBaaS) and devops. Those three technologies are key to creating developer friendly environments — a critical element in many large technology companies’ plans to develop ecosystems of products and services around their core offerings.
  • Corporate value grows, but PE and non-technology buying soars. After declining 32% in 2012, corporate deal-makers grew aggregate value 35% in 2013 to US$129.4b but remained below their 2011 mark of US$140.9b. PE value fell more than corporate last year, but tripled in 2013 to US$58.8b (from US$18.5b in 2012), sailing past 2011’s PE value ofUS$34.8b.
  • Smart mobility and cloud/SaaS disruption drive transformative deals across multiple sectors. The rise of smartphones and tablets drove an unprecedented 10% PC shipment decline in 2013 as businesses and consumers accelerated their shift to mobile devices. Large corporations accelerated their adaptation to mobility, revamping their software architectures toward SaaS solutions that can better accommodate lightweight, mobile client devices.

Look ahead

As the late-year momentum of 2013 suggests, a confluence of factors are coming together to indicate that 2014 will be a strong year for technology M&A.

Deal volume in the last two quarters of 2013 averaged 711 deals per quarter, compared with 644 deals per quarter in the first half. And second-half aggregate value totaled US$118.4b , compared with US$69.8b in the first half. Further, deal making may be continuing into the first quarter of 2014 with several big-ticket deals already announced in Q1 2014, normally the quietest quarter of any year.

Steger concludes: “Technology companies that haven’t adopted technologies such their business to address the five disruptive megatrends of mobile, social, cloud, big data and accelerated technology adaptation quickly enough may find themselves at a crossroads, with non-core or underperforming assets in need of divestiture. Separately, as technology permeates other industries, those industries are likely to continue increasing their role in technology M&A.”

All opinions expressed on USDR are those of the author and not necessarily those of US Daily Review.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.